FIGAROVOX / TRIBUNE - A conference organized at Lyon 2 University on October 14 will bring together several Islamist associations with the kindness of the president of the Observatory of Laïcité, Jean-Louis Bianco. Céline Pina denounces this political guarantee given to anti-republican organizations.
Former local elected, Céline Pina is essayist and activist. In 2015, she denounced the "Muslim Woman" show in Pontoise and recently published Silence Coupable (Kero editions, 2016). With Fatiha Boutjalhat, she is the founder of Viv (r) e la République, a secular and republican citizen movement calling to fight against all totalitarianisms and to promote the indispensable universality of our republican values.
At the University Lyon 2 will be held on October 14, 2017, one of these symposia, the indigenists of the PIR (Party of Indigenous People of the Republic) and Islamists version Muslim Brotherhood have the secret. Entitled "Fight against Islamophobia, an issue of equality?", The workshops target secularism, "state Islamophobia", religious intolerance.
Participants and organizers: Islamist nebula and indigenist, university surety
Among the organizers, we find among others professionals of Islamist entrism and destabilization, related to the Muslim Brotherhood: this is the case of the CCIF (Collective against Islamophobia), the EMF (Muslim Students of France), CRI (Coordination against Racism and Islamophobia).
As for the association PSM "Participation and Muslim spirituality", also announced as present at this symposium, it is illustrated for having employed a jihadist recruiter in Lunel, which was worried in 2015 for having sent 20 young French people in Syria !
Among the participants, we quickly identify the usual academic alibi of the Islamists: François Burgat, very close to Tariq Ramadan. He supported the FIS in Algeria, denying the massive use of violence by Islamists in defiance of all reality and extolled the merits of the Iranian regime.
The man often stands alongside the UOIF, the party of the Muslim Brotherhood, when it comes to testifying as part of the judicial jihad. We also find the usual students enrolled in doctorate masquerading as recognized experts or teachers whose work does not shine either by abundance, nor by the radiation, nor by the scientific quality.
Worse. Are put forward characters like Abdelaziz Chaambi, former leader of the Indigenous people
of the Republic of Lyon, founder of the Tawhid editions (which publish the propaganda of the Muslim Brotherhood) and which is incidentally filed S.
Let's add to the party, Jamila Farah, head of the ICC, who is campaigning against the 2004 law on religious symbols at school, wants to restore blasphemy and whose association to which she belongs prides herself on being close to the brothers. Ramadan and Hassan Iquioussen.
She ran for the legislative elections under the label of the Justice Equality Party, the French branch of the Islamist party of Turkish President Erdogan. Which PEJ claims a moratorium on secularism, the prohibition of blasphemy, the veil at school, the fight against libertinage that would characterize French society and defends communitarianism.
Let's also look at the delicious Souhail Chichah, also teaching in Lyon 2, a supporter of censorship when he does not have the floor. He did not hesitate to punch in order to prevent Caroline Fourest from holding a conference at the Université Libre de Bruxelles, a university in which he was a teacher! Of course, this is not invented, in the context of the conference, he intervenes to complain about the intolerance suffered by the religious.
Let's finish with Ismahane Chouder, a member of the Moroccan Islamist party Al Adl Wal Ihsane, this pro-veil activist is one of the spokespersons for the Dignity march, which brought far-left racists together around the call to "fight "races": she advocates the non-mixed and separatism. And it is to this Areopagus that the President of the Observatory of Laïcité associates his name.
This is a guarantee that in France we can be a bridgehead of obscurantism, anti-secularism, sexism, even be stuck S and have the honors of the academy, the recognition of the media, the political world and the senior civil service.
Funny conference, funny speakers and funny workshops
The introductory introductory text of this symposium is a good example of the cat porridge produced by double talk. We learn that the murder of Charlie's journalists and the waves of attacks we have known had only one consequence: the explosion of "Islamophobia" Gold is false.
The attacks were rather marginal. It talks about uniting academic research and activism for human rights; but, in reality, what is best done as personalities from racist and sexist movements, spreading a propaganda and a violent and totalitarian worldview.
And, the most shocking still is that they will not find opponents in front of them. All the speakers will go in the same direction.
Opening this symposium on Islamophobia, the first workshop raises the question of secularism in our Republic.
One could wonder about the direct relationship thus created between secularism and Islamophobia, but for all those who know the ideology of the Indigenous people of the Republic and the Muslim Brotherhood, we are at the heart of the
doctrine: eliminate secularism or invoke form to better betray it on the merits and make it the society protecting religions, while it is indifferent to them (it does not recognize them, it protects the free exercise, which is very different) and that it is a tool for the emancipation of the individual and society, not a law of concord.
Second workshop: Can we talk about state Islamophobia?
There we pinch. We are supposed to be in the presence of academics for whom the concepts have meaning.
But state racism has a precise definition: it creates apartheid societies where the difference in rights depending on whether you are dominant or dominated is enshrined in the law. One of the most revealing marks is the prohibition of marriages in the name of purity of race or belonging.
Many of the political Islam activists involved in this conference are Algerian, they know that their country prohibits marriages between Muslims and non-Muslims. If they want to fight against state racism, they have a good example, real and not fantasized.
In addition to the lack of intellectual rigor perceptible from the denomination of the workshops, this conference, true staging of the influence of the extreme left Islamist and separatist, takes place in a loaded context: Robert Faurisson, emblematic figure of the negationism and great friend de Dieudonné was a lecturer at Lyon 2 and succeeded in subverting Lyon 3, considered for a time as a den of negationism in France.
At the time the refusal of the university authorities to take their responsibilities has already allowed that, during defenses of theses, the historical falsification receives the academic unction.
But this anointing of the University is decisive for legitimizing a word, the one who carries it and the ideology that
the underlying. Tariq Ramadan, who is not an academic, was offered a chair at Oxford for one reason: to present himself as an academic strengthens his credibility and makes him more acceptable as an interlocutor for the public authorities.
The title he attributes to himself is an imposture, but since Oxford allows it to be done and, on the outside, it gives a false scientific validity to purely ideological positions, he would be wrong to deprive himself of it.
We can only deplore the attitude of Lyon 2 University, which should have learned from its own history and refuse to be held in its walls an extremist political demonstration, disguised in scientific communication.
One can only wonder about the governance of this university, when one knows that at the head of this maneuver is the vice-president in charge of equality and citizen life, Yannick Chevalier.
We would also like to hear the president of Lyon 2, Nathalie Dompnier on this subject, does she guarantee or not this Islamist raid? If not, will she have the courage to cancel it?
One can only wonder about the laxity of the Prefecture and the university authorities that leave a file to intervene in the gallery without raising the question of the risk of disturbing public order. Especially as prefecture side, this detail could not be ignored.
Another scandal is reading the communication of Jean-Louis Bianco. No matter the content, the harm is already done: its presence in the program legitimizes its content and transforms a string of hateful interlocutors of the public authorities.
It recognizes those who hate France and slaps those who defend secularism. It is all the more unforgivable that the man is customary of the fact. His extremely accommodating and purely legal vision of secularism led to the resignation of the Observatory of the authentic republicans Jean Glavany, Françoise Laborde and Patrick Kessel.
Let's not forget either the Observatory's attacks against Elisabeth Badinter or Manuel Valls. When a man betrays the mission entrusted to him and is tirelessly renewed in his office, it says a lot about the true intentions of the power he serves.
If this were not the case, if for Emmanuel Macron secularism really means something, then the penalty must fall. Quickly and definitely. Otherwise, the play on Jean-Louis Bianco, President of the slaughterhouse of secularism, will then make sense.
SYMPOSIUM OF THE OCTOBER 14, 2017 CONFERENCE AT THE UNIVERSITY OF LYON-2
[pdf-embedder url=”https://www.cjfai.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/jeanlouisbianco.pdf”][pdf-embedder url=”https://www.cjfai.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/jeanlouisbianco.pdf”]